The Primordial Nature of Ageist Stereotypes - An Ageist Series (1 of 3)

01
Aug 2024
CPHR Alberta
208
A person is playing a game of chess on a table.

Author: Manley Osbak 

While demographic shifts increase the percentage of older adults in society, unexamined motivations and pervasive biases continue to devalue this growing demographic. Ageist attitudes not only marginalize older adults but undermines the social capacity to organically develop through intergenerational exchange. Consequently, the impoverished environments we create—shaped by stereotypes—become the ones in which we find ourselves mired. This disconnect between demographic reality and societal response underscores the urgency to address our ageist perceptions.

In 1982, the United Nations highlighted the 'phenomenon of aging on a massive scale' at the first World Assembly on Ageing. The Secretary General of the Assembly, Mr. William Kerrigan, emphasized the broad economic and social impacts if the challenges of ageing were not addressed. He pointed out that before developing solutions, a fundamental shift in our attitudes towards ageing was necessary.

Four decades later, little seems to have changed. In 2021, the World Health Organization reported that ageism is widespread and deeply entrenched, impacting society on a level comparable to racism. Ageist stereotypes cast older adults as less productive, less ambitious, resistant to change, and less competent: implying a lack of capability, skill, and intelligence. This enduring prejudice not only marginalizes older people but ensures the development of an impoverished workplace, where biologically driven strengths are neither recognized nor leveraged.

While Kerrigan rebuked our attitude, Ronald Reagan, then President of the United States, clearly, yet unwittingly, expressed it. Speaking to the Assembly, he said, 'Older persons must have a secure place in society. They must be given the opportunity to contribute both socially and economically. Above all, they must not be denied the dignity that comes from being wanted, needed, and respected.' His statement express the biases that Kerrigan warned us about: it is not older adults who need our noble egalitarianism, but rather, it is we ourselves who need to recognize the structure of our own loss.

Ageist stereotypes extend beyond superficial judgments about the specific traits of older people, but instead, reflect a deeper, more fundamental human concern. As depicted in Figure 1, the Stereotype Content Model categorizes these judgments along two primary dimensions: competence and warmth. These dimensions are frequently used as proxies to evaluate an individual's competitive potential. This assessment, in turn, gauges their perceived ability to enhance, undermine, or threaten our own competitive standing.

When people are perceived as competitive and having social status, they are seen as competent but lacking warmth, that is, they are seen as ‘cold.’ Conversely, those seen as not competitive and with low status are typically seen as warm but incompetent. Ageist stereotypes categorize older adults as warm but incompetent due to their perceived lack of competitiveness and low social status. Thus, stereotypes essentially assess a person's capacity to either threaten or support one’s self-enhancement drives and the groups with which one identifies, such as one's employer. Engaging in stereotyping involves making decisions about including or excluding people based solely on our perceptions of their potential to competitively threaten or support us.

Stereotypes distort the truth about people, imposing a false identity upon them and simplifying complex human attributes. While they may be intended to protect the in-group from perceived threats posed by the out-group, ageist stereotypes deprive us of the rich intergenerational processes that hold profound social and interpersonal value. This is the very dynamic that the Secretary General highlighted when he warned about the impacts of ageism. Ageist stereotypes overlook the vital contributions that different age groups make to each other’s development and well-being. Addressing ageism, therefore, is not about extending charity to older adults, as suggested by Reagan’s address; it is about recognizing that their involvement is crucial to our collective and individual development.

Ageist stereotypes are more than just superficial misjudgments about older adults; they represent a more primordial concern about competitiveness, resource allocation, and self-enhancement. As explained through the Stereotype Content Model, ageist stereotypes pigeonhole older adults as warm but incompetent, reflecting their perceived lower competitiveness and social status. Such misguided perceptions not only misrepresent individual capabilities but also hinder the potential benefits of intergenerational solidarity, engagement, and exchange.

Historical insights, such as those from the United Nations' World Assembly on Aging, reveal the persistent nature of these stereotypes and their detrimental effect on social exchange, particularly within the workplace. Importantly, human society is fundamentally intergenerational, with an evolutionary interdependence that strengthens communal ties and enhances collective growth. Recognizing and addressing ageism is therefore not an act of charity but a crucial step towards harnessing this intergenerational strength and fostering a more sustainable and productive society and workplace.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


Manley Osbak is a Workforce Development Specialist with Work Locomotion where he leads the development and delivery of supervisor training. As a Certified Training and Development Professional with over 25 years of experience in the energy, construction, and manufacturing sectors, Manley focuses on helping supervisors master their roles in an increasingly complex operating environment. Having authored and coauthored numerous journal papers and trade magazine articles, Manley is well known for his investigative approach and crisp delivery. Connect with him on LinkedIn and access his current work on worklocomotion.Substack.com.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo • October 23, 2026
Why frontline leadership matters more than ever As organizations across Alberta navigate economic uncertainty, workforce pressures, and rapid technological change, one question continues to surface: what separates organizations that thrive from those that struggle to adapt? At Great Place To Work®, their research points to a consistent answer: leadership. Not just executive leadership, but leadership at every level of the organization. While senior leaders set vision and direction, frontline leaders shape the day-to-day employee experience that determines whether people trust, engage, innovate, and embrace change. In many ways, the future of work will be defined not by technology, but by the quality of leadership that guides people through it. Alison Grenier, Head of Culture and Research for Great Place to Work, has been studying the Best Workplaces in Canada for the past 15 years. She sat down with CPHR Alberta to discuss the importance of frontline leaders in shaping workplace culture. “In many ways, the future of work will be defined not by technology, but by the quality of leadership that guides people through it.” Alison Grenier, Head of Culture and Research, Great Place To Work Canada Q: Why is leadership such an important topic right now? Because organizations are operating in an environment of constant change. Employees are being asked to adapt to new business priorities, new ways of working, and increasingly, new technologies. In times like these, people look to their leaders for clarity, support, and confidence. Strong leadership helps employees navigate uncertainty and stay focused on what matters most. Q: What connection do you see between leadership and workplace culture? Culture is often thought of as something abstract, but employees experience culture through everyday interactions with their leaders. How leaders communicate, listen, recognize effort, involve people in decisions, and demonstrate care all shape the employee experience. Over time, those experiences become culture. Q: Why are frontline leaders especially important? Frontline leaders are the people employees interact with most frequently. They sit at the intersection of organizational strategy and everyday work. They explain change, answer questions, remove barriers, coach employees, and reinforce purpose. Research consistently shows that employees are more likely to stay, contribute ideas, and give extra effort when they feel supported by their direct leader. Yet frontline managers are often the most overlooked group when it comes to development and support. Q: What challenges are frontline employees facing today? Frontline employees continue to experience significant pressure. Research points to high levels of burnout, concerns about workload, staffing shortages, and a desire for greater flexibility and support. Many also report feeling disconnected from decision-making and organizational priorities. Q: What do employees need most from leaders right now? They need leaders who listen, communicate clearly, and help them understand how their work contributes to a larger purpose. Employees want transparency when circumstances change. They want to feel heard when they raise concerns. They want recognition when they make extra effort. Most importantly, they want leaders who genuinely care about their success and well-being. These may sound like simple behaviours, but they have a profound impact on trust, engagement, and retention. Q: How does artificial intelligence fit into this conversation? AI is one of the most significant workplace changes many organizations have faced in years, but successful AI adoption is less about technology and more about leadership. Organizations that treat AI as a technology project will struggle, while those that treat AI as a people and leadership opportunity are more likely to succeed. Even employees who may never use AI directly in their roles will likely be affected by changes in workflows, processes, customer expectations, or business operations. When employees feel excluded from conversations about the future, uncertainty tends to grow. Bringing everyone into the discussion helps build understanding, trust, and readiness for change. Q: What enables organizations to adapt more effectively to change? Trust. Our research consistently finds that employees in high-trust workplaces are more willing to adapt, learn, collaborate, and embrace change. When trust is strong, employees are more likely to assume positive intent, contribute ideas, and support organizational priorities. Q: What role can HR professionals play in strengthening leadership? HR professionals play a critical role by helping leaders translate organizational goals into meaningful employee experiences. That includes providing leaders with the tools, skills, and insights they need to communicate effectively, listen actively, recognize contributions, and build trust. The goal is not for HR to "own" culture, but to enable leaders to create the conditions where great culture can thrive. Q: What message would you leave with Alberta leaders? Never underestimate the impact you have on the people around you. As organizations prepare for the future of work, leadership remains one of the most powerful competitive advantages available. Leadership has always mattered. In an era of constant change, it matters more than ever.
By Jessica Jaithoo • October 19, 2026
Author: Taia Northrup , 2026 Social Media Committee Volunteer Halloween is the season for haunted houses and stories that send shivers down our spines. But for HR professionals, some of the scariest situations don’t involve ghosts or goblins. They happen right within the workplace. Behind every employee experience is a workplace culture shaped by communication, leadership, expectations, and trust. Research suggests that factors such as unclear roles, unmanaged workplace stress, and limited opportunities for employees to speak up can have meaningful consequences for both employees and organizations (Hassan, 2013; Government of Canada, 2016; CIPD, 2024) This Halloween, let’s shine a light on the spooky side of HR: the workplace realities we do not always talk about. 1. The ghost of communication past Poor communication can haunt an organization long after a message is missed. Important updates get lost; expectations are assumed rather than explained, and employees are left piecing information together on their own. This results in confusion, frustration, duplicated work, and a growing lack of trust. The reality is that communication isn’t just about sending a message. It’s about making sure the right people receive it, understand it, and know what to do with it. Two-way communication also gives employees a way to raise concerns and contribute ideas, helping organizations better understand the experiences of their workforce (CIPD, 2024) 2. The never-ending zombie job description Responsibilities keep growing. Projects are added. Employees become unofficial go-to person for tasks that don’t seem to belong to anyone else. Unclear roles and responsibilities can leave employees overwhelmed, leaders frustrated, and teams working in silos. Research by Hassan (2013), examining 1,699 employees across 45 government agency office, found that great role clarity was associated with higher job satisfaction and lower turnover rates. When accountability is missing, tasks fall through the cracks, or multiple people unknowingly do the same work. Employees need clarity about their roles, decision-making authority, priorities, and how their work connects to the bigger picture. The Government of Canada also identifies clearly defined duties and responsibilities as one of the practices that supports psychological health in the workplace (Government of Canada, 2016). A job description shouldn’t be a document that comes back to life once a year for performance reviews. Expectations should evolve alongside the role. 3. The turnover vampire One employee leaves. Then another. Before long, the team is spending more time recruiting, onboarding, and training than getting work done. High turnover can drain an organization of institutional knowledge, team stability, and employee morale. And when remaining employees absorb the workload, burnout can quickly follow. But here’s the frightening part: turnover is often treated as a recruitment problem when the underlying causes may have little to do with recruitment. Employees may be leaving because of poor leadership, limited development opportunities, unmanageable workloads, lack of recognition, or a lack of clarity about what is expected of them. Research on role clarification has also identified a relationship between clearer roles, job satisfaction, and lower turnover (Hassan, 2013). 4. The haunted house of unspoken expectations Employees are expected to know what success looks like. Managers assume their teams understand the priorities. Performance reviews arrive, and suddenly, everyone discovers they’re not on the same page. When expectations aren’t clearly communicated, employees may feel blindsided by feedback, while managers become frustrated that work isn’t being completed as expected. The problem isn’t always a lack of effort. Sometimes, it's a lack of clarity. Clear expectations need to be established early and revisited often. Regular check-ins, meaningful feedback, and conversations about priorities can help prevent misunderstandings before they become performance concerns. Role clarity is also associated with greater work satisfaction, reinforcing the value of ensuring employees understand what their roles require (Hassan, 2013). 5. The burnout cauldron The team is short-staffed. Deadlines aren’t moving. Everyone is doing their best to keep things running, and taking a break feels impossible. Overtime, extra responsibilities become the norm, workloads keep increasing, and exhaustion is mistaken for dedication. Burnout rarely appears overnight. It can build gradually as employees operate in survival mode for weeks or months. The World Health Organization describes burnout as an occupational phenomenon resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed (WHO, 2019) Organizations need to look beyond individual coping strategies and examine the workplace conditions contributing to exhaustion. Managing workloads, supporting employee participation, and defining responsibilities are among the practices recommended by the Governent of Canada for psychologically healthy workplaces (Government of Canada, 2016) Sustainable performance requires realistic expectations, supportive leadership, and the ability to raise concerns without fear. 6. The employee engagement masquerade The survey results look good. The engagement event was a success. Everyone smiled at the team photo. But behind the scenes, employees may feel disconnected, unheard, or reluctant to speak honestly about their experiences. Social events and recognition programs can contribute to a positive employee experience. However, they cannot replace trust, fir treatment, meaningful work, and leaders who listen and follow through. Asking employees feedback, listening without becoming defensive, and communicating what happens next. When people see that their input leads to meaningful action, engagement becomes more than a survey. Research highlighted by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD, 2024) suggests that employee voice can strengthen the long term benefits of effective management practices. Bringing the shadows into the light The most challenging workplace issues aren’t always dramatic. Often, they’re the small, recurring problems that go unaddressed until they become much harder to ignore. A missed conversation, an unclear responsibility, another resignation, a team that has stopped speaking up. These are reminders that a healthy workplace doesn’t happen by accident. It takes intentional communication, clear expectations, supportive leadership, and a willingness to address uncomfortable issues before they grow. This Halloween, let’s look beyond the policies and processes and pay attention to the everyday experiences shaping our workplaces.
October 9, 2026
The Board of Directors continues to provide oversight of CPHR Alberta’s 2026 – 2028 Strategic Plan. At its September meeting, the Board reviewed progress across the organization’s three strategic priorities and its continued focus on strong governance and financial stewardship. Influence and Visibility of the HR Profession CPHR Alberta continues to elevate the visibility and credibility of the CPHR designation with employers, policymakers, academic institutions and the broader business community. The Board remains focused on advancing recognition of the CPHR designation as the benchmark for excellence in HR and strengthening the position of CPHRs as trusted professionals and organizational leaders. Future-Ready HR Community CPHR Alberta continues to invest in programming that prepares members for the evolving world of work, with a focus on relevant and future-focused professional development, including emerging areas such as AI, HR law and executive leadership development. The 2026 Annual Conference continued to strengthen its position as a key gathering for Alberta’s HR community. One-third of attendees were at the executive level and nearly half attended for the first time, demonstrating both strong senior-level engagement and the ability to reach new audiences. The Board continues to support investment in learning, leadership development and connection that helps build a strong, future-ready HR community. Member Engagement and Community Connection Membership continues to grow, reaching 7,266 active members as of June 30, 2026, a 5% increase year over year . CPHR Alberta welcomed 407 new members year-to-date, with growth across most membership categories and regions. The Board is encouraged by this continued growth and remains focused on strengthening member engagement, connection and belonging across CPHR Alberta’s jurisdiction. Financial Position and Governance Planning CPHR Alberta continues to maintain a strong financial position and remains aligned with its full-year breakeven objective. The Board continues to monitor emerging economic risks, supported by regular forecasting and appropriate reserves. The Board also continues to strengthen governance, succession planning and Board effectiveness to ensure CPHR Alberta is well positioned to deliver on its strategic priorities. Looking Ahead The Board remains focused on effective oversight of the 2026 – 2028 Strategic Plan and ensuring CPHR Alberta is positioned to deliver meaningful and sustainable value to members. Progress in strengthening the visibility of the profession, preparing the HR community for the future, growing and engaging membership, and maintaining strong organizational stewardship provides a solid foundation for the work ahead. The next Board meeting takes place in November 2026, after which we will again share our key messages. If you have any questions regarding these key messages or the Board of Directors, please contact chair@cphrab.ca . We welcome your feedback!
MORE NEWS