Why Robust, Safe and Respectful Workplace Policies are an Essential Prerequisite to a Successful DEI Program
22
Feb 2022
147
Author:
Jillian Kruschell (she/her/hers)
, Chief Executive Officer, Libra Consulting Ltd.
Every great team strives to create a safe, inclusive and diverse workplace culture – a culture that will help the organization recruit and retain employees, a culture that will make a great impression on not only employees, but clients, prospective clients and all other stakeholders too.
There are many ways to arrive at that pinnacle and every road map looks different, but the starting point is often the same – tried, tested and true policies for a safe and respectful workplace. Without those policies in place and effectively in use from the beginning, it’s easy to get off course.
The Alberta Human Rights Act
(Government of Alberta) states that “Employers have obligations to keep their employees safe and create an environment free of discrimination, harassment and violence.” These issues are often considered and addressed in policy and procedures completely separate from Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI). But at my organization, we recognize that those policies are essential building blocks to DEI success.
Essential to understanding human behavioural motivation is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, which uses a hierarchical pyramid to illustrate the importance of each individual having their basic needs met as a precursor to achieving meaningful self actualization.
Only when an organization is firmly rooted in its commitment to keeping its employees safe from any type of workplace harassment, discrimination or abuse, can a truly diverse, equitable and inclusive culture grow. It’s easy for organizations to implement policy that meets the legal obligations, but properly implementing those policies and firmly standing by the guidelines set out within them is what really counts.
Any organization can distribute policies to employees, most do it as a box to check during the onboarding process. But after a brief scan during those early days on the job, are your policies filed away, never to be seen again? Are they written in such a way that employees will be able to digest their content as meaningful and get a sense of how those policies will translate into action in the day-to-day? It is essential to be able to show employees that inevitable conflicts can be resolved fairly, that they are empowered to advocate for their personal safety and well being and that nobody, be it colleagues, customers or suppliers, will be permitted to treat them poorly.
At my organization, we believe that inclusion has to come before diversity, because intentionally recruiting diverse talent into a workforce shouldn’t be done if the groundwork of creating an environment in which they will be able to meaningfully contribute and thrive has not come first. Without a strong base of inclusivity, diverse talent, which could bring in new ideas and perspectives will likely fail and leave. Aside from the obviously expensive repercussions of turnover, this could damage your reputation as an employer and your ability to recruit diverse talent in future.
Employers who succeed at DEI are employers who are ready to do right by their employees and can see and value the complex humanity of their individual team members. If you can achieve this, you’ll be positioned to recognize the significant improvements in productivity, engagement and collaboration available if they are able to create an environment of psychological safety.
Safe and respectful workplace policies that demonstrate an employer’s commitment to prioritizing employee wellbeing and responding in a fair and timely manner to any complaints that come in speak volumes to their employees about how valued they truly are within that organization. If you really want to make a statement, consider implementing third party handling of sensitive workplace complaints. Employees all over the world have been asking for this. Not only does it drastically reduce employees’ barriers to coming forward, and eliminates the risk to the organization of complaints being mishandled because of internal ingrained bias and conflicts of interest.
In the 4 stages of Psychological Safety
, Timothy R Clark says the following about Inclusion Safety:
“As the basic glue of human society, inclusion safety offers the comforting assurance that you matter. If you’re a leader and you want your people to perform, you must internalize the universal truth that people want, need and deserve validation. Inclusion safety requires that we condemn negative bias, arbitrary distinction, or destructive prejudice that refuses to acknowledge our equal worth and the obligation of equal treatment.”
One of the most foundational ways we can create this for our teams is making a sincere commitment to the creation of safe and respectful workplaces for all people.
It’s also important to note that there are varying degrees of psychological safety. It’s not just about feeling safe from workplace harassment, bullying and discrimination. Achieving complete psychological safety means employees feel included, safe to learn, safe to contribute and safe to speak up and challenge the status quo.
With established inclusion and psychological safety, diverse hires become empowered to offer valuable new perspectives. Diverse employees bring in varying educational and cultural backgrounds and unique life experiences that simply can’t be found in homogeneous environments. Whether employers are trying to create solutions, increase efficiencies, enter a new market, develop a new product or disrupt an established industry, diversity is the key to creativity.
So if you’re thinking about DEI, start by taking a step back and focus on the foundation. We know business leaders love quick wins, but any structure built on a shoddy foundation will eventually crumble and performative band aids will always fall away. Look at turnover, employee engagement and productivity. Then get your house in order before inviting new people into it.
Citations
Government of Alberta. Alberta Human Rights Act. 2000. Queen's Printer, https://www.qp.alberta.ca/1266.cfm?page=A25P5.cfm&leg_type=Acts&isbncln=9780779744060
Maslow, Abraham. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review, vol. 50 (4), 1943, pp. 370–396.
Clark, Timothy R. The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety: Defining the Path to Inclusion and Innovation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Incorporated, 2020.
The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.
The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.
Author: Kanwaljit Chaudhry We often begin developing leaders after we have given them something to lead. Someone is promoted into their first supervisory role. They join a leadership development program, receive coaching, attend workshops, or are paired with a mentor. All of these can be valuable. But by then, leadership development has already been happening. Long before the title arrives, people are learning how to exercise judgment, influence others, navigate disagreement, take responsibility and make decisions when the answer is not obvious. The question for HR is: Do we have to wait for the title to help those capabilities grow? Create opportunities, not just programs Some of the most valuable leadership development happens through work itself. A stretch assignment. Leading a small project. Presenting an idea to senior colleagues. Coordinating people who do not report to you. Navigating competing priorities. Being trusted to make a decision rather than simply carrying one out. None requires a management title. HR can help organizations look at development as not only as courses people attend, but as experiences people need. That may mean encouraging managers to distribute meaningful opportunities rather than repeatedly turning to the person who is already proven. It may mean designing project work so different employees have opportunities to lead. It may mean making mentoring, coaching or job-shadowing available before someone enters a formal leadership pipeline. The objective is not to make everyone a manager. It is to give more people opportunities to build capabilities that will serve them whether or not formal leadership is their eventual destination. Make room to learn from experience Experience alone does not necessarily create development. Two people can go through similar experiences and take very different things from them. What often makes the difference is the opportunity to reflect: What worked? What didn't? What did I notice about myself? What would I do differently next time? HR can help make those conversations part of development rather than leaving them to chance. A manager checking in after a difficult project can ask more than, “Did we deliver?” A mentor can help someone examine why a conversation went differently than expected. A performance discussion can explore not only what someone accomplished, but how they influenced others, exercised judgment or responded when things became uncertain. These are relatively small interventions. But they help turn experience into learning. Notice leadership before it becomes obvious There is another role for HR: helping organizations broaden what they notice. Potential does not always announce itself loudly. The person who volunteers to coordinate a complicated piece of work may be demonstrating leadership capacity. So might the employee who brings people together when a team is stuck, asks the question no one else is asking, helps a colleague succeed without needing credit, or remains thoughtful when everyone else is rushing toward an answer. If we look for leadership potential only among those who already resemble our current leaders, we may keep finding the same kinds of people. Creating broader opportunities allows capability to become visible before we decide who has it. Pay attention to what the organization teaches Organizations are also developing future leaders when they are not deliberately trying to. Employees notice who gets promoted. They notice what behaviour gets rewarded, whose ideas receive attention and what happens when someone makes a mistake. They notice whether managers share information or protect it, whether difficult conversations are avoided or handled respectfully, and whether asking for help is treated as good judgment or weakness. These observations become lessons about what leadership looks like here. HR influences many of the systems through which those lessons are reinforced e.g., performance management, recognition, development, succession planning and promotion among them. That makes an important question worth asking: What are our people learning about leadership from the way our organization actually works? The answer may tell us as much about our leadership pipeline as any competency framework. Before the title Leadership development does not have to begin with a leadership program. It can begin when someone is trusted with something slightly beyond what they have done before and supported while they figure it out. It can happen when a manager shares the reasoning behind a difficult decision rather than only communicating the outcome. It can happen when someone gets to lead a project before they have people reporting to them. And it can happen when an employee has someone who helps them make sense of an experience rather than simply move on to the next task. HR cannot manufacture leaders. But HR can help create workplaces where people have opportunities to practise judgment, responsibility, influence and reflection long before a title makes those things part of their job description. Perhaps the question is not only “Who are our future leaders?” It is also: “What are we doing today that gives future leadership capacity a chance to emerge?”
At the CPHR Alberta Conference, we asked HR leaders one question: What leadership capability matters most for the future of your organization? Leaders picked up a star and placed it beside their answer. By the end of the conference, HR leaders cast 131 votes across 16 capabilities. Three stood out, with two tied for first place. Here is what they told us. What the Data Showed The capabilities on the board came from Bright Wire's PLUS Leadership Framework, a proprietary model built to define what effective leadership looks like across every level of an organization and is organized across four dimensions: Courageous Coach-Like Disciplined for Results and Relational The results below reflect the capabilities HR professionals believe matter most.
Author: Robin Daultani Mental health support. Fitness benefits. Stress management resources. Workplace wellness programs have evolved significantly over the past decade. Yet one foundational pillar of employee health and performance remains conspicuously absent from most wellness strategies: sleep. The cost of this gap is staggering. A landmark RAND Corporation study¹ found that insufficient sleep costs the Canadian economy up to $21.4 billion annually, through a combination of absenteeism and reduced productivity. A Gallup study² reinforced this finding, showing that poor sleepers report more than double the rate of unplanned absences compared to other workers. And a 2026 Wellhub study³ found that 83% of employees identify poor sleep as a contributing factor to burnout, a figure that demands attention when nearly nine in ten employees report burnout symptoms annually. Consider what this looks like in practice. A team member who slept poorly scrolls through emails at 7am already feeling behind. By mid-morning, a decision that should take minutes stretches into a 45-minute deliberation. After lunch, focus drops sharply, not because of the workload, but because the brain is running on insufficient rest. By 3pm, a second coffee masks the fatigue but does nothing for the impaired judgment underneath. Research shows that after 17 hours of continuous wakefulness, the equivalent of a normal waking day ending at 11pm, cognitive impairment matches that of someone who is legally intoxicated⁴. This is not an unusual day. For many employees, this is every day. Sleep rarely appears on the wellness agenda, leaving a significant and measurable performance gap unaddressed. The reason is partly cultural. Sleep is still widely perceived as a personal responsibility. But the research suggests otherwise: sleep is not a personal indulgence. It is a performance lever that affects every metric HR professionals are already tracking: productivity, absenteeism, burnout, and retention. The same RAND study¹ that quantified the cost of insufficient sleep also found the flipside: if Canadians who sleep under six hours started sleeping just one hour more per night, it could add $12 billion to the national economy. The returns are not theoretical. They are measurable, achievable, and waiting to be captured. The good news is that addressing sleep does not require a major overhaul of existing wellness programs. Organizations can start by simply putting sleep on the wellness agenda. Most workplace wellness surveys ask about stress, mental health, and physical activity. Adding questions about sleep quality or duration to existing wellness assessments can provide baseline data to identify and measure the scope of the issue within their workforce. Leaders and managers who openly prioritize rest and recovery give permission for the rest of the organization to do the same. Small cultural shifts like discouraging late-night emails or respecting boundaries around after-hours communication can quietly improve sleep conditions across an entire team. None of these require a budget. They require intentional inclusion. Now consider what becomes possible. A team member, after two weeks of consistent, quality sleep, arrives at work already focused. The mid-morning decision is made in minutes. The afternoon dip is manageable, not debilitating. The second coffee becomes optional, not essential. Nothing else about their workload or responsibilities has changed. They show up more empathetic and more present for their customers, peers, and family. The only difference is how well they slept. The performance gap between these two versions of the same employee is not marginal. It is the difference between surviving and thriving. The question for HR professionals is no longer whether sleep affects organizational performance. The research has answered that definitively. The question is whether sleep has earned a place in their wellness strategy. And if not, what that gap is quietly costing their organization.
