Neurodiversity Inclusion: Autism at Work

20
Oct 2022
145
A close up of a colorful painting with a rainbow of colors.
Photo Credit: 
Alexander Grey

Author: Wilma Li

Did you know that 1 ”autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a commonly diagnosed neurodevelopmental disorder in Canada, with a national prevalence estimate of 1 per 66 children diagnosed”?  2 ”Researchers estimate that between 70 and 90 percent of autistic people are unemployed or underemployed in Canada”.  With the Great Resignation and prevalent remote work increasing globalization, 3 “Canadian employers are being challenged when it comes to filling vacant roles”. 3 ”Many companies are overlooking a group that could help: those living with autism.”

But first, what is autism?

Autism is a 4 “developmental disability that can cause significant social, communication, and behavioural challenges”. 4 “It is found in every country, every ethnic group, and every socioeconomic class”. 4 “No two people with autism are the same. The learning, thinking, and problem-solving abilities of people with characteristics of this diagnosis can range from severely challenged to exceptionally gifted. Some of these characteristics can contribute to outstanding ability to focus and perceive pattern”.  Because of this, more employers are actively recruiting such individuals.

Then, what is neurodiversity?

Neurodiversity is a 4 “concept where neurological differences are to be recognized and respected as any other human variation”. The recognized neurological differences include dyspraxia, dyslexia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyscalculia, autism spectrum disorders and Tourette syndrome. Neurodiversity is also a 4 “social movement that seeks to celebrate autistic forms of communication and self-expression”.

Now that we have defined the terms, how can we, as human resources professionals, create win-win situations to fill the talent gap while positively impacting the unemployed or underemployed autistic people in Canada?

4 Four areas to consider:

  • Key Elements and Models for Recruitment, Hiring and Training.
  • Supervisor Role, Preparation and Support.
  • Career Development, Progression and Retention Considerations.
  • Organizational Considerations.

Key Elements and Models for Recruitment, Hiring and Training

  1. Investigate elements of company culture and infrastructure that can facilitate the success of an Autism at Work program, including the importance of having sponsorship from top leadership, internal champions, and the full range of stakeholders.
  2. Identify company talent needs that can align with your neurodiversity hiring initiatives. 
  3. Explore how community and national resources, including local employment service providers, higher education allies, and high school outreach initiatives, could help you develop a pipeline of neurodiverse talent.
  4. Develop or modify screening, interviewing, onboarding, and other hiring processes, to ensure accessibility and accommodation for a neurodiverse candidate pool.

Supervisor Role, Preparation and Support

  1. Understand the significant role that managers play in the successful implementation of Autism at Work programs, as well as the critical role they play in disclosure and other factors in successful employee integration.
  2. Design a comprehensive preparation, training, and engagement strategy for supervisors who are a part of your Autism at Work program.
  3. Learn from other employers who have successfully implemented Autism at Work program (i.e., SAP) to study the elements of a comprehensive training program and informational sessions for managers, from initiative overviews to information about available resources. 
  4. Explore the components of an effective ongoing support system for supervisors in sustaining the neurodiversity hiring initiative, as the program, its participants, and its supervising managers all evolve in their goals and needs.

Career Development, Progression and Retention Considerations

  1. Look into areas of the career development and retention process that might require attention in order to sustain the effectiveness and ultimate success of your Autism at Work program over the long term.
  2. Investigate deeply into those behavioral characteristics of some Autistic persons that might impact career progression, development, retention, and performance management.
  3. Explore a range of internal organizational resources and structures that could facilitate improved outcomes in these processes and that could provide support to the Autistic individual.
  4. Gain awareness of those external community resources that might provide services and support to further maximize both retention and individual performance effectiveness over time.

Organizational Considerations to Improve Outcomes of an Autism at Work Program

  • Consider messaging and workplace culture, to enriching existing resources and targeted support services.
  • Look for other potential external resources that could serve the same purpose, including public relations, interface with families, extended community resources for emerging support areas, and more.
  • Consider long-term sustainability and scalability issues, such as funding mechanisms, impact measurement, and considerations involved in both domestic and global expansion of an Autism at Work program.

For more ideas or information on neurodiversity or autism at work inclusion, please contact us at: www.bkicorp.com. At Business Knowledge Integration, we coach you and your organization on your intercultural, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) needs to achieve sustainable results.


 

References

1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909034/

2 https://www.surreyplace.ca/overcoming-barriers-to-employment-improving-representation-of-autistic-people-in-the-workforce/#:~:text=Researchers%20estimate%20that%20between%2070,doesn't%20accommodate%20neurodivergent%20people

3 https://globalnews.ca/news/8723098/canadians-autism-overlooked-employment-opportunities-report/

4 Bruyere, Susanne M., Autism at Work (2021 virtual online course), Diversity and Inclusion Certificate for HR program, Yang-Tan Institute on Employment and Disability, Cornell University


 

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.

 

 


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 19, 2026
Author: Kanwaljit Chaudhry We often begin developing leaders after we have given them something to lead. Someone is promoted into their first supervisory role. They join a leadership development program, receive coaching, attend workshops, or are paired with a mentor. All of these can be valuable. But by then, leadership development has already been happening. Long before the title arrives, people are learning how to exercise judgment, influence others, navigate disagreement, take responsibility and make decisions when the answer is not obvious. The question for HR is: Do we have to wait for the title to help those capabilities grow? Create opportunities, not just programs Some of the most valuable leadership development happens through work itself. A stretch assignment. Leading a small project. Presenting an idea to senior colleagues. Coordinating people who do not report to you. Navigating competing priorities. Being trusted to make a decision rather than simply carrying one out. None requires a management title. HR can help organizations look at development as not only as courses people attend, but as experiences people need. That may mean encouraging managers to distribute meaningful opportunities rather than repeatedly turning to the person who is already proven. It may mean designing project work so different employees have opportunities to lead. It may mean making mentoring, coaching or job-shadowing available before someone enters a formal leadership pipeline. The objective is not to make everyone a manager. It is to give more people opportunities to build capabilities that will serve them whether or not formal leadership is their eventual destination. Make room to learn from experience Experience alone does not necessarily create development. Two people can go through similar experiences and take very different things from them. What often makes the difference is the opportunity to reflect: What worked? What didn't? What did I notice about myself? What would I do differently next time? HR can help make those conversations part of development rather than leaving them to chance. A manager checking in after a difficult project can ask more than, “Did we deliver?” A mentor can help someone examine why a conversation went differently than expected. A performance discussion can explore not only what someone accomplished, but how they influenced others, exercised judgment or responded when things became uncertain. These are relatively small interventions. But they help turn experience into learning. Notice leadership before it becomes obvious There is another role for HR: helping organizations broaden what they notice. Potential does not always announce itself loudly. The person who volunteers to coordinate a complicated piece of work may be demonstrating leadership capacity. So might the employee who brings people together when a team is stuck, asks the question no one else is asking, helps a colleague succeed without needing credit, or remains thoughtful when everyone else is rushing toward an answer. If we look for leadership potential only among those who already resemble our current leaders, we may keep finding the same kinds of people.  Creating broader opportunities allows capability to become visible before we decide who has it. Pay attention to what the organization teaches Organizations are also developing future leaders when they are not deliberately trying to. Employees notice who gets promoted. They notice what behaviour gets rewarded, whose ideas receive attention and what happens when someone makes a mistake. They notice whether managers share information or protect it, whether difficult conversations are avoided or handled respectfully, and whether asking for help is treated as good judgment or weakness. These observations become lessons about what leadership looks like here. HR influences many of the systems through which those lessons are reinforced e.g., performance management, recognition, development, succession planning and promotion among them. That makes an important question worth asking: What are our people learning about leadership from the way our organization actually works? The answer may tell us as much about our leadership pipeline as any competency framework. Before the title Leadership development does not have to begin with a leadership program. It can begin when someone is trusted with something slightly beyond what they have done before and supported while they figure it out. It can happen when a manager shares the reasoning behind a difficult decision rather than only communicating the outcome. It can happen when someone gets to lead a project before they have people reporting to them. And it can happen when an employee has someone who helps them make sense of an experience rather than simply move on to the next task. HR cannot manufacture leaders. But HR can help create workplaces where people have opportunities to practise judgment, responsibility, influence and reflection long before a title makes those things part of their job description. Perhaps the question is not only “Who are our future leaders?” It is also: “What are we doing today that gives future leadership capacity a chance to emerge?”
By Marina Perkovic July 22, 2026
At the CPHR Alberta Conference, we asked HR leaders one question: What leadership capability matters most for the future of your organization? Leaders picked up a star and placed it beside their answer. By the end of the conference, HR leaders cast 131 votes across 16 capabilities. Three stood out, with two tied for first place. Here is what they told us. What the Data Showed The capabilities on the board came from Bright Wire's PLUS Leadership Framework, a proprietary model built to define what effective leadership looks like across every level of an organization and is organized across four dimensions: Courageous Coach-Like Disciplined for Results and Relational The results below reflect the capabilities HR professionals believe matter most. 
By Jessica Jaithoo July 9, 2026
Author: Robin Daultani Mental health support. Fitness benefits. Stress management resources. Workplace wellness programs have evolved significantly over the past decade. Yet one foundational pillar of employee health and performance remains conspicuously absent from most wellness strategies: sleep. The cost of this gap is staggering. A landmark RAND Corporation study¹ found that insufficient sleep costs the Canadian economy up to $21.4 billion annually, through a combination of absenteeism and reduced productivity. A Gallup study² reinforced this finding, showing that poor sleepers report more than double the rate of unplanned absences compared to other workers. And a 2026 Wellhub study³ found that 83% of employees identify poor sleep as a contributing factor to burnout, a figure that demands attention when nearly nine in ten employees report burnout symptoms annually. Consider what this looks like in practice. A team member who slept poorly scrolls through emails at 7am already feeling behind. By mid-morning, a decision that should take minutes stretches into a 45-minute deliberation. After lunch, focus drops sharply, not because of the workload, but because the brain is running on insufficient rest. By 3pm, a second coffee masks the fatigue but does nothing for the impaired judgment underneath. Research shows that after 17 hours of continuous wakefulness, the equivalent of a normal waking day ending at 11pm, cognitive impairment matches that of someone who is legally intoxicated⁴. This is not an unusual day. For many employees, this is every day. Sleep rarely appears on the wellness agenda, leaving a significant and measurable performance gap unaddressed. The reason is partly cultural. Sleep is still widely perceived as a personal responsibility. But the research suggests otherwise: sleep is not a personal indulgence. It is a performance lever that affects every metric HR professionals are already tracking: productivity, absenteeism, burnout, and retention. The same RAND study¹ that quantified the cost of insufficient sleep also found the flipside: if Canadians who sleep under six hours started sleeping just one hour more per night, it could add $12 billion to the national economy. The returns are not theoretical. They are measurable, achievable, and waiting to be captured. The good news is that addressing sleep does not require a major overhaul of existing wellness programs. Organizations can start by simply putting sleep on the wellness agenda. Most workplace wellness surveys ask about stress, mental health, and physical activity. Adding questions about sleep quality or duration to existing wellness assessments can provide baseline data to identify and measure the scope of the issue within their workforce. Leaders and managers who openly prioritize rest and recovery give permission for the rest of the organization to do the same. Small cultural shifts like discouraging late-night emails or respecting boundaries around after-hours communication can quietly improve sleep conditions across an entire team. None of these require a budget. They require intentional inclusion. Now consider what becomes possible. A team member, after two weeks of consistent, quality sleep, arrives at work already focused. The mid-morning decision is made in minutes. The afternoon dip is manageable, not debilitating. The second coffee becomes optional, not essential. Nothing else about their workload or responsibilities has changed. They show up more empathetic and more present for their customers, peers, and family. The only difference is how well they slept. The performance gap between these two versions of the same employee is not marginal. It is the difference between surviving and thriving. The question for HR professionals is no longer whether sleep affects organizational performance. The research has answered that definitively. The question is whether sleep has earned a place in their wellness strategy. And if not, what that gap is quietly costing their organization.
MORE NEWS