A Case Study of an HRIS Implementation

09
Feb 2023
505
A paper cut out of the letter i on a yellow background

Author:  Ada Tai

Has your organization considered adopting a Human Resource Information System (HRIS)? Selecting and implementing HRIS has become a trendy topic in recent years. Employers recognize the need to enhance workplace efficiency and accuracy through integrated business applications that are reliable and user-friendly. In this blog, I will share a case study of one of our clients who is implementing an HRIS for the first time and several “aha” moments along the journey.

Background: 

Company XYZ is a value-based organization. The company experienced positive growth in the last five years: it grew its employee base from 30 to just under 100 and maintained a roster of 30 subcontractors/freelancers. Until early 2022, the accounting system was used for employee expenses and payroll. Recruitment, employee files, performance review and other employee data management functions were still done manually. Furthermore, reporting and benefits administration were handled by two other systems. Unsurprisingly, employee timesheets and time off requests were managed using Excel and email. 

The Accounting team spent endless hours every month managing multiple systems, retrieving information from one system to feed into another, and ensuring data integrity and accuracy. Managers were concerned about the inefficiency and security risk of the current method. Additionally, leaders contemplated the need for better decision-making and future scalability as the company projects a 60 - 70% headcount growth in the coming three years.

Initial Action:  

We were lucky that this was a long-term client of our company, so we were familiar with their business environment and the employee situation. Two people from our firm were assigned to this project, one being the project lead and the other person providing support. After obtaining the budget, we created a cost estimate and a project plan with major timelines, milestones, people and resources needed. Then we dived into “Needs Assessment” understanding and business requirements gathering.

Needs Assessment: 

1. We sent out a questionnaire to four types of users in the company to understand what the “must-have” functions and “nice-to-have” functions are. The users include:

  a) Frontline employees (end-users)

  b) Supervisors & managers (end-users & approvers)

  c) Accounting, IT, Administration (Functional users)

  d) Leaders (end-users, approvers & ability to oversee everything)

2. After compiling the information, we identified the top “must-have” functions as:

A table showing the hr is compatible with the current accounting system

The following were the “nice-to-have” functions:

A table showing the different departments of a company

3. We then facilitated a focus group meeting and five one-on-one meetings with leaders, functional users, and selected supervisors and staff to deep dive into their needs.

Vendor Selection:

1. With all the information collected, we quickly narrowed the selection to the top five vendors. 

2. We then sent the short-listed vendors to confirm their functionality, pricing, and customer service approach. Then our team watched their live demonstrations. Given our familiarity with the company culture and employee demographics, we knew only certain vendor systems would match the client’s needs, and the user interface must be extremely intuitive. 

3. We reported our findings and recommendations to the company. The top two vendors were brought in for live presentations and demonstrations.

  • After both demonstrations, we asked the audience to provide ratings and feedback.

4. Once the top vendor was selected, the company representative negotiated and signed the vendor agreement.

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.When evaluating vendor pricing, a few factors should be taken into account: Company location, Cost per employee, Monthly cost, Implementation fee, Total cost of the first year, Total annual cost from the second year on.

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.After confirming the functionalities of the selected HRIS, the company reviewed the current systems, their pricing, effectiveness, vendor relationship and contract terms, and decided as to which current systems would stay and which systems would be phased out over the coming period of time.

If someone thinks that selecting a system is the end of a complex project, it is only the beginning of it…

Implementation: 

1. The company assembled a 4-people Implementation Team, which includes a manager, an employee, an accounting person and an IT staff.

2. We then worked with the Implementation Team to decide on a department in the company that works the best as the Test Department for user/usability testing. Since HRIS systems nowadays are more intuitive, most vendors do not provide user training or training manuals. The Test Department we selected had more tech-savvy employees inclined to adapt to change.

3. The Implementation Team and our team then prepared information to transfer to the new system and converted the company’s historical data into the new system.

4. Working with the vendor, we did a “soft launch” of the new system with the Test Department for three months. The existing systems were operating at the same time. During these three months, we learned what worked well and what needed adjustment. We also gathered the Test Department staff’s feedback on a bi-weekly basis. We then worked with the vendor to ensure a smooth transition to the official launch.

5. In the fourth month, the new HRIS was officially in operation! The launch party was a lot of fun and got people’s attention. During the initial period after the launch, the Implementation Team, the Test Department and our team addressed questions from the staff. The existing systems would still be in operation for another 6 months to ensure a smooth transition and backup.

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.Having a Test Department is a critical element to success: It ensures early adopters get a chance to use and review the new system, feed information as to what needs to be adjusted and help the company set the stage for the official launch. For large organizations with change management challenges, the Test Department also serves as the company’s influencing force for the rest of the employees/users. 

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.Taking into account the cost of the Implementation Team and consultants’ time in the company’s HRIS budget is key.

What's now?

So far, so good! After the official launch, several training sessions were delivered to ensure a comfortable transition for employees and managers. A quarterly check-in and a formal new system evaluation were also planned to help the Implementation Team gather information and make adjustments as needed. 

Selecting and implementing HRIS system is a costly and complex project! Each organization has its unique needs, budget and challenges. Having a structured project plan and a methodical approach will help ensure businesses’ success. 

I see. I hear. I experience. is a column created by and written by Ada Tai, a chartered member of CPHR Alberta. The column is written in a blog format where Ada and invited co-authors will present their own experiences and interpretations of the world of human resources and its impact on business management. This and the subsequent posts are copyrighted materials by the author(s) and only reflect their personal views, not CPHR Alberta’s.

Author bio: With an MBA Degree, a CPHR, and an SHRM-SCP designation, Ada Tai has been working as an HR professional in a variety of industries for 15 years. Through her consulting firm, Ada and the team provide various strategic and pragmatic management consulting services.  Ada’s public speaking skills have enabled her to be regularly invited to speak about HR, people management, career search, and networking topics throughout the province. She is also a well-respected Instructor at the University of Alberta and MacEwan University.

Contact information: 

BadaB Consulting Inc. provides a wide range of human resources solutions, including Strategic HR and Succession Planning, Organizational Design & Development, Merger & Acquisition Support, Recruitment, Skills Development Training, Compensation Design, Performance Management, Workplace Investigation, Policy Development, etc. Another specialty of BadaB’s services is personal job search and career coaching. The team has effectively helped over 500 people to find work.

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta. 

 

 

 

 

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



Before the Title: HR's Role in Growing Leadership Capacity

By Jessica Jaithoo • August 19, 2026
Author: Kanwaljit Chaudhry We often begin developing leaders after we have given them something to lead. Someone is promoted into their first supervisory role. They join a leadership development program, receive coaching, attend workshops, or are paired with a mentor. All of these can be valuable. But by then, leadership development has already been happening. Long before the title arrives, people are learning how to exercise judgment, influence others, navigate disagreement, take responsibility and make decisions when the answer is not obvious. The question for HR is: Do we have to wait for the title to help those capabilities grow? Create opportunities, not just programs Some of the most valuable leadership development happens through work itself. A stretch assignment. Leading a small project. Presenting an idea to senior colleagues. Coordinating people who do not report to you. Navigating competing priorities. Being trusted to make a decision rather than simply carrying one out. None requires a management title. HR can help organizations look at development as not only as courses people attend, but as experiences people need. That may mean encouraging managers to distribute meaningful opportunities rather than repeatedly turning to the person who is already proven. It may mean designing project work so different employees have opportunities to lead. It may mean making mentoring, coaching or job-shadowing available before someone enters a formal leadership pipeline. The objective is not to make everyone a manager. It is to give more people opportunities to build capabilities that will serve them whether or not formal leadership is their eventual destination. Make room to learn from experience Experience alone does not necessarily create development. Two people can go through similar experiences and take very different things from them. What often makes the difference is the opportunity to reflect: What worked? What didn't? What did I notice about myself? What would I do differently next time? HR can help make those conversations part of development rather than leaving them to chance. A manager checking in after a difficult project can ask more than, “Did we deliver?” A mentor can help someone examine why a conversation went differently than expected. A performance discussion can explore not only what someone accomplished, but how they influenced others, exercised judgment or responded when things became uncertain. These are relatively small interventions. But they help turn experience into learning. Notice leadership before it becomes obvious There is another role for HR: helping organizations broaden what they notice. Potential does not always announce itself loudly. The person who volunteers to coordinate a complicated piece of work may be demonstrating leadership capacity. So might the employee who brings people together when a team is stuck, asks the question no one else is asking, helps a colleague succeed without needing credit, or remains thoughtful when everyone else is rushing toward an answer. If we look for leadership potential only among those who already resemble our current leaders, we may keep finding the same kinds of people.  Creating broader opportunities allows capability to become visible before we decide who has it. Pay attention to what the organization teaches Organizations are also developing future leaders when they are not deliberately trying to. Employees notice who gets promoted. They notice what behaviour gets rewarded, whose ideas receive attention and what happens when someone makes a mistake. They notice whether managers share information or protect it, whether difficult conversations are avoided or handled respectfully, and whether asking for help is treated as good judgment or weakness. These observations become lessons about what leadership looks like here. HR influences many of the systems through which those lessons are reinforced e.g., performance management, recognition, development, succession planning and promotion among them. That makes an important question worth asking: What are our people learning about leadership from the way our organization actually works? The answer may tell us as much about our leadership pipeline as any competency framework. Before the title Leadership development does not have to begin with a leadership program. It can begin when someone is trusted with something slightly beyond what they have done before and supported while they figure it out. It can happen when a manager shares the reasoning behind a difficult decision rather than only communicating the outcome. It can happen when someone gets to lead a project before they have people reporting to them. And it can happen when an employee has someone who helps them make sense of an experience rather than simply move on to the next task. HR cannot manufacture leaders. But HR can help create workplaces where people have opportunities to practise judgment, responsibility, influence and reflection long before a title makes those things part of their job description. Perhaps the question is not only “Who are our future leaders?” It is also: “What are we doing today that gives future leadership capacity a chance to emerge?”

What HR Leaders Are Telling Us Their Organizations Need Right Now

By Marina Perkovic • July 22, 2026
At the CPHR Alberta Conference, we asked HR leaders one question: What leadership capability matters most for the future of your organization? Leaders picked up a star and placed it beside their answer. By the end of the conference, HR leaders cast 131 votes across 16 capabilities. Three stood out, with two tied for first place. Here is what they told us. What the Data Showed The capabilities on the board came from Bright Wire's PLUS Leadership Framework, a proprietary model built to define what effective leadership looks like across every level of an organization and is organized across four dimensions: Courageous Coach-Like Disciplined for Results and Relational The results below reflect the capabilities HR professionals believe matter most. 

The Business Case for Sleep: What HR Professionals Need to Know

By Jessica Jaithoo • July 9, 2026
Author: Robin Daultani Mental health support. Fitness benefits. Stress management resources. Workplace wellness programs have evolved significantly over the past decade. Yet one foundational pillar of employee health and performance remains conspicuously absent from most wellness strategies: sleep. The cost of this gap is staggering. A landmark RAND Corporation study¹ found that insufficient sleep costs the Canadian economy up to $21.4 billion annually, through a combination of absenteeism and reduced productivity. A Gallup study² reinforced this finding, showing that poor sleepers report more than double the rate of unplanned absences compared to other workers. And a 2026 Wellhub study³ found that 83% of employees identify poor sleep as a contributing factor to burnout, a figure that demands attention when nearly nine in ten employees report burnout symptoms annually. Consider what this looks like in practice. A team member who slept poorly scrolls through emails at 7am already feeling behind. By mid-morning, a decision that should take minutes stretches into a 45-minute deliberation. After lunch, focus drops sharply, not because of the workload, but because the brain is running on insufficient rest. By 3pm, a second coffee masks the fatigue but does nothing for the impaired judgment underneath. Research shows that after 17 hours of continuous wakefulness, the equivalent of a normal waking day ending at 11pm, cognitive impairment matches that of someone who is legally intoxicated⁴. This is not an unusual day. For many employees, this is every day. Sleep rarely appears on the wellness agenda, leaving a significant and measurable performance gap unaddressed. The reason is partly cultural. Sleep is still widely perceived as a personal responsibility. But the research suggests otherwise: sleep is not a personal indulgence. It is a performance lever that affects every metric HR professionals are already tracking: productivity, absenteeism, burnout, and retention. The same RAND study¹ that quantified the cost of insufficient sleep also found the flipside: if Canadians who sleep under six hours started sleeping just one hour more per night, it could add $12 billion to the national economy. The returns are not theoretical. They are measurable, achievable, and waiting to be captured. The good news is that addressing sleep does not require a major overhaul of existing wellness programs. Organizations can start by simply putting sleep on the wellness agenda. Most workplace wellness surveys ask about stress, mental health, and physical activity. Adding questions about sleep quality or duration to existing wellness assessments can provide baseline data to identify and measure the scope of the issue within their workforce. Leaders and managers who openly prioritize rest and recovery give permission for the rest of the organization to do the same. Small cultural shifts like discouraging late-night emails or respecting boundaries around after-hours communication can quietly improve sleep conditions across an entire team. None of these require a budget. They require intentional inclusion. Now consider what becomes possible. A team member, after two weeks of consistent, quality sleep, arrives at work already focused. The mid-morning decision is made in minutes. The afternoon dip is manageable, not debilitating. The second coffee becomes optional, not essential. Nothing else about their workload or responsibilities has changed. They show up more empathetic and more present for their customers, peers, and family. The only difference is how well they slept. The performance gap between these two versions of the same employee is not marginal. It is the difference between surviving and thriving. The question for HR professionals is no longer whether sleep affects organizational performance. The research has answered that definitively. The question is whether sleep has earned a place in their wellness strategy. And if not, what that gap is quietly costing their organization.
MORE NEWS